<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Newest Industry - Latest Comments in Dear Apache Software Foundation: FIX THE MSIE SSL KEEPALIVE SETTINGS!</title><link>http://newestindustry.disqus.com/</link><description>Chronicles of a Crazy Canuck</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:47:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dear Apache Software Foundation: FIX THE MSIE SSL KEEPALIVE SETTINGS!</title><link>http://newestindustry.org/2007/06/06/dear-apache-software-foundation-fix-the-msie-ssl-keepalive-settings/#comment-20810268</link><description>I totally agree with you that the developers of the Apache Web server creates a great product despite of the fact that sometimes it makes some small mistakes like you mentioned. I hope that it would never happen again in the future. Well I have to find out if they have fixed this problem. Btw thanks for the interesting  post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Craig Barteson from &lt;a rel="dofollow" href="http://www.azoft.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;software application development&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trumenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Apache Software Foundation: FIX THE MSIE SSL KEEPALIVE SETTINGS!</title><link>http://newestindustry.org/2007/06/06/dear-apache-software-foundation-fix-the-msie-ssl-keepalive-settings/#comment-8774633</link><description>I'm glad to see you exclude nokeepalive.  With a setup including an OCSP responder, that nokeepalive flag kills us with multiple pki cert validation requests per page load.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scooter Hanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:08:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Apache Software Foundation: FIX THE MSIE SSL KEEPALIVE SETTINGS!</title><link>http://newestindustry.org/2007/06/06/dear-apache-software-foundation-fix-the-msie-ssl-keepalive-settings/#comment-2751109</link><description>Sadly, it seems even IE7 can't do things properly - we'll have to keep going with nokeepalive even longer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is a text tracking down AJAX issues in IE7 to keepalive: &lt;a href="http://qfox.nl/notes?1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://qfox.nl/notes?1&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andreas Lange</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:02:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Apache Software Foundation: FIX THE MSIE SSL KEEPALIVE SETTINGS!</title><link>http://newestindustry.org/2007/06/06/dear-apache-software-foundation-fix-the-msie-ssl-keepalive-settings/#comment-1210524</link><description>YEAHHHHHHHHH    this is plain stupid and old age! Someone needs to look at this now!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:09:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Apache Software Foundation: FIX THE MSIE SSL KEEPALIVE SETTINGS!</title><link>http://newestindustry.org/2007/06/06/dear-apache-software-foundation-fix-the-msie-ssl-keepalive-settings/#comment-1188154</link><description>This change fixed a problem we had after a patch update to apache resulted in IE clients not being able to access one of our enterprise Java apps over SSL through an ISA firewall.&lt;br&gt;The error seen in the ISA logs was:&lt;br&gt;Error Code: 500 Internal Server error. The context has expired and can no longer be used. (-2146893033)&lt;br&gt;By changing ssl.conf to only specify ssl-unclean-shutdown for MSIE 6+, the IE clients were able to use the application without errors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bwg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:42:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Apache Software Foundation: FIX THE MSIE SSL KEEPALIVE SETTINGS!</title><link>http://newestindustry.org/2007/06/06/dear-apache-software-foundation-fix-the-msie-ssl-keepalive-settings/#comment-1188153</link><description>hey steve,&lt;br&gt;you should file a bug about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;personally I can't verify it as I don't run windows. but in general the httpd project is more conservative than performance focused.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ian holsman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>